MODEL MATEMATIKA DALAM MENENTUKAN PRIORITAS DISTRIBUSI LOGISTIK PERTAHANAN MENGGUNAKAN MATLAB

Anung Nugroho; Tjatur Supriyono

doi:10.63824/jdk.v14i1.480

Authors

Anung Nugroho Akmil
Tjatur Supriyono Prodi Administrasi Pertahanan Akademi Militer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63824/jdk.v14i1.480

Keywords:

AHP, Linear Programming, Logistik Pertahanan, MATLAB Monte Carlo, TOPSIS

Abstract

Distribusi logistik pertahanan merupakan aspek kritis dalam mendukung kesiapan operasional, namun pengalokasian sumber daya terbatas masih menghadapi tantangan terkait prioritas dan efisiensi. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan model matematika terintegrasi untuk menentukan prioritas distribusi logistik pertahanan menggunakan MATLAB. Metode yang diterapkan mencakup Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) untuk menentukan bobot kriteria, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) untuk ranking lokasi, Linear Programming untuk optimasi alokasi logistik, serta Simulasi Monte Carlo untuk menganalisis ketidakpastian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bobot kriteria tertinggi pada urgensi (0.4673), dengan Pangkalan A menempati peringkat pertama prioritas distribusi (skor 0.7719). Optimasi linear programming menghasilkan biaya total optimal -289448.37, sedangkan simulasi Monte Carlo menegaskan robustness model dengan tingkat keberhasilan 100% dan variasi biaya ±2.66%. Model terintegrasi terbukti lebih efisien dibanding metode alternatif, memberikan kontribusi signifikan terhadap pengambilan keputusan logistik pertahanan.

References

Asnah, N., Syam, B. M., & Silitonga, F. (2023). Pengaruh Sikap Disiplin Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mata Kuliah Matematika Di Akademi Militer. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Pertahanan, 10(1), 53-59.

Barykin, S. Y., Kapustina, I. V., Sergeev, S. M., & Yadykin, V. K. (2020). Algorithmic foundations of economic and mathematical modeling of network logistics processes. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040189

Beskorovainyi, V. (2021). Mathematical Models of Decision Support in The Problems of Logistics Networks Optimization. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, 4(18), 5–14.

Bury, P. (2021). Conceptualising the quiet revolution: the post-Fordist revolution in western military logistics. European Security, 30(1), 112–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2020.1796650

Chobar, A. P., Bigdeli, H., Shamami, N., & Abolghasemian, M. (2024). Optimizing Hub Location for Military Equipment : A Robust Mathematical Model for Uncertainty and Meta-Heuristic Approaches. Fuzzy Optimization and Modelling Journal, 5(4), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.71808/2024.fomj./1002657

Dordevic, M., Tešić, R., Todorović, S., Jokić, M., Das, D. K., Stević, Ž., & Vrtagic, S. (2022). Development of Integrated Linear Programming Fuzzy-Rough MCDM Model for Production Optimization. Axioms, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11100510

Ekström, T. (2026). Introduction to the Special Collection on Military Logistics : The Transformation from Peace Support Operations to Territorial Defence. Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, 9(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.538

Ekström, T., Hilletofth, P., & Skoglund, P. (2020). Differentiation strategies for defence supply chain design. Journal of Defense Analytics and Logistics, 4(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/JDAL-06-2020-0011

Heijungs, R. (2020). On the number of Monte Carlo runs in comparative probabilistic LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25(2), 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-019-01698-4

Juan, L., Haliza, J., & Zahari, M. (2022). Military Strategy: Exploitation of Military Logistics Intelligence for the Malaysian Armed Forces. The Journal of Defence and Security, 16(1), 2022.

Kay, M. G. (2016). Matlog: Logistics Engineering Using Matlab. Araştırma Makalesi Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Engineering Sciences and Design, 4(1), 1308–6693.

Kodors, S., Zvaigzne, A., Litavniece, L., Lonska, J., Silicka, I., Kotane, I., & Deksne, J. (2022). Plate Waste Forecasting Using the Monte Carlo Method for Effective Decision Making in Latvian Schools. Nutrients, 14(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030587

Kurasov, D. (2020). Mathematical modeling system MatLab. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1691(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1691/1/012123

Munayang, M. (2025). Analisis Komparatif dan Tren Implementasi Metode Multi-Criteria Decision Making (SAW, AHP, TOPSIS) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur Semantik (2020-2025). Kohesi: Jurnal Multidisiplin Saintek, 10(7), 1–7.

Nakonechnyi, O. (2020). Mathematical Model for Forecasting the State of a Logistical System of State Defense. Advanced Information Systems, 4(1), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2020.1.05

Pliekhova, G. (2024). Logistics Models of Critical Situations, Their Use During Warfare. Silesian University Publishing, 210.

Sadabadi, S. A. (2021). A Linear Programming Technique to Solve Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision Making Problems With an Application. RAIRO Operations Research, 55, 83–97.

Serrano, A., Kalenatic, D., López, C., & Montoya-Torres, J. R. (2023). Evolution of Military Logistics. Logistics, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7020022

Siregar, I. (2019). Supplier Selection by Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Techniques for Order Preference Methods with Similarities to Ideal Solutions (TOPSIS). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1339(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012023

Ugolnikov, A., Diachenko, V., Kliat, Y., Kosenko, A., & Shelukhin, S. (2021). Devising Matrix Technology for Forecasting the Dynamics in the Operation of a Closed Military Logistics System. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(3(114)), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.249270